lobirescue.blogg.se

The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many
The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many











the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many

The needs of the many outweigh . . .” to which Kirk replies, “the needs of the few. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few: With Paul Knauer, Daniel Whiting-King. Most memorable, of course, is Spock’s famous line from his moment of sacrifice: “Don’t grieve, Admiral. Spock gives Admiral Kirk an antique copy as a birthday present, and the film itself is bookended with the book’s opening and closing passages. The film references several works of classic literature, none more prominently than A Tale of Two Cities. See STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN (Paramount Pictures 1982). The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one is the ethos of Spock, a character in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982). First, we recognize that police power draws from the credo that “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Second, while this maxim rings utilitarian and Dickensian (not to mention Vulcan 2 1), it is cabined by something contrarian and Texan: distrust of intrusive government and a belief that police power is justified only by urgency, not expediency. Hear are 2 clips that have Spock following the axiom, 'The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.'Im looking forward to your comments and insights. Spock, effectively making him a legal authority for interpreting the Texas Constitution.Īppropriately weighty principles guide our course. The Texas Supreme Court when writing their opinion in Robinson v. SFWA Middle Grade and Young Adult Writers.Operating Policies and Procedures (OPPM).If you leave out both the "the's", then, yes - virtually unintelligible, if not wholly ungrammatical. > Then, is it ungrammatical to leave out "the" in front of "many" or "few" in the OP's sentence? (** it's a stretch because the sentence is highly misleading due its repetition of 'many', which renders it effectively unusable) 'the needs of many outweigh the needs of few' => The needs of the many outweigh the needs of many.įor this last sentence to make any kind of sense*, and it's a bit of a stretch**, 'the many' must be interpreted as a strict majority, and 'many', therefore, as a sizeable minority. the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.' - Spock. So the semantic versioning scheme is oriented towards the many: the API consumers. Spock - The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or Item Information Item specifics Shipping and handling Sales Tax for an item. In general, there will (hopefully) be many more consumers than providers. 'the needs of many outweigh the needs of few' => the needs of the majority would take precedence over the needs of many. For any API, we see there is an asymmetry in the relationships is has with API providers and API consumers. 'the needs of many outweigh the needs of few' => there exists a (scarce) few whose needs would be trumped by the needs of many. 'my needs outweigh the needs of few' => the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the me. This line was spoken by Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy) in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, directed by Nicholas Meyer (1982). 'my needs outweigh the needs of few' => the needs of the majority would take precedence over my needs ("the needs of me"). 'my needs outweigh the needs of few' => there exists a (scarce) few whose needs would be trumped by my needs ("the needs of me"). So, for example, and by way of illustration only: That said, in the absence of corroborating context, it would be highly unusual to immediately interpret 'few' as a majority, though note well that, by contrast, the ascription of 'many' needn't automatically point to a majority. To ram the point home, it's conceivable that some might describe a majority as being few, depending on their expectation, and, reasoning similarly, a minority could conceivably be described as being many, if one was expecting, say, none. Most people attach themselves to Kirk and Spock's conversation at the end or the ensuing affair afterward, bu. What may seem few to one, may appear as a glut to another. Probably my favorite scene in all of Star Trek. Usually, both 'few' and 'many' are delineated subjectively. Easily move forward or backward to get to the perfect clip.

#THE NEEDS OF THE FEW OUTWEIGH THE NEEDS OF THE MANY TV#

Find the exact moment in a TV show, movie, or music video you want to share. However, in 'the needs of many outweigh the needs of few'. Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S03E07 Unification III clip with quote 'The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few' Yarn is the best search for video clips by quote. Similarly, in 'the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one'. But, absent consensus on some new set of. Post Great Financial Crisis, neoliberal ideas have been discredited among much of the public and are actively contested even within governing elites. Four functions of markets - 'The period from 2008 until now has been a kind of undead neoliberal era. The many + the few = the all, the whole, everybody (ie the universe of discourse - hence "partition"). The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. In the original (and tyrannical) 'the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few'.













The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many